Historical Firearms
Welcome to Historical Firearms, a site that looks at the history, development and use of firearms, as well as wider military history
image
image

Vickers Gun Disassembly

This week’s Armourer’s Bench video is a collaboration with a friend, Richard Fisher, who runs Vickers Machine Gun Collection and Research Association.

The Vickers Gun is an iconic weapon, developed from the Maxim and adopted by the British in 1912. It served for over 50 years in conflicts all around the world. In this video Richard shows us how to disassemble a the gun and talk us through its internals.

Big thank you to Richard for taking the time to help with this video and provide the voice over explaining the process!

We’ll have more videos on the Vickers Gun in the future, check out the accompanying blog for some more photos over on the TAB website.

You can check out Richard’s work over on the Vickers Machine Gun Collection and Research Association’s site here.

Vickers Machine Gun Collection Tour

My good friend Rich, who runs the Vickers Machine Gun Collection and Research Association, has shared the first of a series of videos showing off some of the items in the collection. I’m looking forward to the next video in the series.

I’ve had the pleasure of visiting the collection a couple of times and Rich has a wealth of knowledge on the subject.

During my last visit we collaborated on a video for TAB demonstrating the disassembly of the Vickers which I’m looking forward to sharing soon.

Check out Rich’s website for the Vickers Machine Gun Collection and Research Association here.

Interview with Richard Fisher of the Vickers Machine Gun Collection

Last week while I was on a research trip I had the opportunity to visit the Vickers Machine Gun Collection. The collection’s director, Richard Fisher, was kind enough to show me around and discuss the collection and the research he’s doing on the Vickers gun. 

image

Richard’s website is a fantastic resource for all things Vickers gun and he’s been kind enough to help me with Vickers-related queries in the past. So it was great to meet him in person and take a look at the collection. 

Check out the accompanying blog on the Armourer's Bench website for more photos, here

In Action: Vickers Gun

The photograph above features troops from the 1st Battalion, Royal Irish Fusiliers showing members of the Rift Valley (Kikuyu) Home Guard how to fire a Vickers MkI machine gun at the Naivasha Rifle Range. 

The Kikuyu Home Guard were formed during the Mau Mau Uprising in Kenya. They were intended to help police and security forces defend settlements and farms from attack, envisaged much as the Home Guard had been during the Second World War. A state of emergency was declared in Kenya in October 1952, following the murder of a number of white settler families in a spate of brutal killings. A group known as the Mau Mau began an insurgent uprising against British rule targeting white settlers and any Kenyans that didn’t support them. 

The Kenyan authorities and the British Army fought a three year counter-insurgency campaign to quell the rebellion. The Kikuyu were the largest ethnic group in Kenya who opposed the Mau Mau. The Home Guard was formed in early 1953 and were armed predominantly with shotguns and bolt-action rifles. They were never issued heavier weapons like the Vickers. 

Note that the Vickers is fitted with the ‘Eliminator, Flash and Blast Deflector’, designed in the mid-1930s it was a metal cowl that fitted over the Vickers’ muzzle. It entered mainstream use during the Second World War and continued to be used until the Vickers was retired in the 1960s. The deflector was very effective at hiding both muzzle flash and mitigating blast that could kick up dirt and dust. 

With the collapse of the uprising and retreat of the Mau Mau into the Aberdare mountains the Kikuyu Home Guard were stood down in 1956, the uprising finally ended in 1960.

Sources:

Images: 1 2 

My thanks to Richard over at Vickersmg.org for extra information on the Vicker’s muzzle device.


If you enjoy the content please consider supporting Historical Firearms through Patreon!

In Action: Maxim Gun

In the photographs above the Machine Gun Section of the 8th Royal Scots (The Royal Regiment) pose with their machine guns. In the first photograph the Machine Gun, Maxim, Mk.I is mounted on a carriage while in the second it is mounted on a tripod and deployed in a trench during a field exercise. Following experiences during the Second Boer War the use of carriages to mount machine guns quickly fell from favour. Both tripods and carriages hadbeen used during the Boer war but by the 1910s the British Army solely used tripods. The Maxim’s tripod can clearly be seen in the third photograph which features both of the Machine Gun Section’s guns set up side by side.

The 8th Royal Scots were a Territorial Force battalion. The Territorial Force was a part-time volunteer reserve branch of the British Army formed in 1908. The 8th Scots was formed in 1908, they would later become the first Scottish territorial unit to mobilise and arrived in France in November 1914.

The Maxim still made extensive use of brass for their spring housings, spade grips and barrel jacket. In the field these were frequently painted. The photographs above were probably taken some time between 1908 and 1912, the troops in the first photograph also appear to have Magazine Lee–Enfield’s slung. 

British battalions at the beginning of the war each had a Machine Gun Section, commanded by a lieutenant, made up of two six-man squads operating the battalions’ two machine guns. During the First World War the number of machine guns per battalion increased rapidly.    

The Maxim guns first saw limited use with the British Army during the First Matabele War in 1893 but it officially entered British Service in 1896, seeing action during the First Boer War. The improved Vickers-Maxim Machine Gun MkI, also chambered in .303, replaced it in British Service in 1912. But when the British Expeditionary Force departed for France in August 1914, many battalions took their older Maxim Gun Mk.I and Mk.IIs, these were finally withdrawn from service in 1917. 

Sources:

Images: 1-3 are courtesy of www.newbattleatwar.com whose focus is on commemorating the men of Midlothian, Scotland who fought during the Great War. The site’s owner curates a collection of photographs, those above were given to him by George Souness, nephew of George Souness one of the men in the third photograph, who was sadly killed in 1918. 

Image 4 is courtesy of the Imperial War Museum 

My thanks to Jonathan Ferguson, Curator of Firearms at the Royal Armouries, for his note on correct Maxim Gun designations. 

Vickers-Maxim Machine Gun, M. Peeler, (2013)


image

If you enjoy the content please consider supporting Historical Firearms through Patreon!

Vickers Machine Gun team of the Prince of Wales’s Own Regiment of Yorkshire in action, date unknown.
More on the Vickers here
Vickers Machine Gun team of the Prince of Wales’s Own Regiment of Yorkshire in action, date unknown.
More on the Vickers here

Vickers Machine Gun team of the Prince of Wales’s Own Regiment of Yorkshire in action, date unknown. 

More on the Vickers here

In Action: Vickers Gun

The two photographs above show the British Army’s Vickers machine gun in action during late 1944. Both images show the Vickers Guns being used in the barrage fire role where indirect fire would be directed onto enemy positions. 

The first image shows a battery of four guns from the 2nd Middlesex Regiment opening up barrage fire in support of troops crossing the Maas-Schelde Canal at Lille-St. Hubert, 20 September 1944. The second image shows a Vickers Gun in action during the Battle of Overloon in October 1944. Note the empty belts and thousands of spent cases surrounding the crew. Both photographs show the guns with their dial sights mounted. These were used to aim fire at greater ranges and effectively plunge fire onto areas up to 4,500 yards away. 

The British perfected the technique of indirect, plunging fire during the First World War with the tactic continuing to be used during the Second World War. The 100th Machine Gun Company’s barrage at High Wood is a classic example of indirect fire. Barrage Fire could be used to pin down enemy troops, interdict enemy movements and cover lines of enemy attack from relative safety. 

More on the Vickers Gun here

Sources:

Image Sources: 1 2 3


If you enjoy the content please consider supporting Historical Firearms through Patreon!

The Blistering Barrage of High Wood

The British Army had entered the war with just two machine guns per battalion. In contrast the Imperial German Army had embraced the new weapon and fully integrated it into their infantry regiments. As the stalemate of trench warfare took hold the British quickly learned how to best use the machine gun and in October 1915, the Machine Gun Corps was formed. Grouping together the infantry’s Vickers Guns into companies of 10 guns which would be attached to a brigade while the infantry were increasingly equipped by the new Lewis light machine guns. New tactics for the massed use of machine guns were developed and published in the official manual ‘The Employment of Machine Guns’. One of the new tactics was ‘barrage fire’ where groups of guns fired indirectly to prevent enemy troop movements, give covering fire, or generally harass and suppress the enemy. The guns were angled high so their fire would arch over the battlefield in a similar way to the trajectory of artillery plunging to create a beaten zone. One of the first uses of this long range barrage technique was by the 100th Machine Gun Company at High Wood, during the Battle of the Somme, who fired a staggering 100,000 rounds over 12 hours. The Machine Gun Corps fought in every major theatre of the war, with its men winning seven Victoria Crosses. The Corps was finally disbanded in 1922 but the venerable Vickers remained in service into the 1960s.   

Amid the chaos and carnage of the Battle of the Somme a small wood became a focal point of the battle. High Wood had originally been part of the German secondary trench  line but when British troops stormed their frontline it became the centre of their defences. Over three months the British made continued attacks against the wood but the area’s geography meant British artillery was unable to support the attacks with accurate shelling for fear of hitting British troops. It was decided instead that the next attempt would be supported by a concentrated machine gun barrage to break up German resistance and hold off reinforcements. The 100th Machine Gun Company were ordered to provide barrage fire in support of the infantry’s attack they eventually fired for an unprecedented twelve hours. 

Initial success during the Battle of Bazentin Ridge had seen the British briefly occupy High Wood on the 14th July but that success was not capitalised on and the wood was abandoned to the enemy the next day. On the 24th August the 100th Machine Gun Company began setting up, training their guns on German positions 2,500 yards away. At 5.45pm seven of the Company’s Vickers Guns opened up barrage fire to prepare the way for the infantry to go in.

image

Vickers gun crews resting near their guns (source)

At 6.26pm the battery ceased fire as it’s feared their fire was falling short. Captain Graham Seton-Hutchison, the company’s commander, believes the fire is effective and at 6.40pm firing is resumed. The seven guns of the company again rained down indirect fire onto the German line. The fire from the guns arced over the battlefield plunging into German positions as the infantry of the 100th Brigade attacked the wood.

Later that evening water for the guns’ cooling jackets began to grow scarce but the company’s guns had no mechanical problems after two hours of continuous fire. The men kept themselves busy loading ammunition into the Vickers guns’ 250-round cloth belts. At 8.00pm the company began to alternately overhaul, clean and replace the barrels of the guns to maintain their continued fire.

Captain Seton-Hutchinson later recalled:

“Prisoners examined at Divisional and Corps Headquarters reported that the effect of the Machine Gun barrage was annihilating, and the counterattacks which had attempted to retake the ground lost were broken up whilst being concentrated east of the Flers Ridge and of High Wood.”   

Hundreds of rounds per minute rained down on the German line with 67,000 rounds fired onto enemy positions by dusk. Sections from the Highland Light Infantry of the 33rd Division worked hard bringing up fresh supplies of ammunition and water for the guns’ cooling jackets which had to be continually refilled. The guns’ barrels became red hot and the company were so desperate for water that during the night the machine gunners gave up their personal water bottles to fill the guns’ cooling jackets. The three attacking battalions of the 100th Brigade were unable to break through the German line and had to fall back. They were unable to capture High Wood and attacks in the sector continued throughout August until the wood finally fell on the 14th September. 

The next day at 6.10am the company finally ceased fire, having fired a total of 99,500 rounds in just over 12 hours, holding German reinforcements at bay and covering the 100th Brigade’s attack and retreat. The British army continued to use their Vickers guns in the barrage or plunging fire role through the First and Second World Wars until they were finally retired in the 1960s. 

Sources:

Images: 1 2 3 4


If you enjoy the content please consider supporting Historical Firearms through Patreon!

British L7 General Purpose Machine Gun 

Designed by Ernest Vervier, the FN MAG or Mitrailleuse d'Appui Général became the principal general purpose machine gun of many Western nations. The MAG brings together design traits from a number of earlier weapons including the Browning Automatic Rifle and the German MG42. Vervier and FN sought to develop a weapon similar to the MG34 & MG42, the first true general purpose machine guns. The FN MAG quickly gained a reputation for being a reliable, robust machine gun which could function in a variety of harsh environments. In 1958 the Swedish Army became the first to adopt the MAG, in their then standard 6.5x55mm Mauser service cartridge, as the Kulspruta 58.

The British Army began testing and evaluation of the FN MAG chambered in 7.62x51mm in the late 1950s designating it the X15E1. Troop trials continued through 1959 when the weapon was finally adopted as the L7 in 1961. Entering service during the 1960s, the L7 has seen action in dozens of conflicts from the Indonesian–Malaysian Confrontation and counter-insurgency operations in Northern Ireland to the Falklands and more recent conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan. The L7 GPMG has been affectionately nicknamed the ‘gimpy’ by generations of British troops.

image

Original sectional drawing from the notes prepared for the troop trials of the X15E1 (source)

It was initially intended that the L7 would replace both the venerable Vickers Gun and the Bren. The Bren, however, remained in service as the L4A4 into the 1990s. Britain bought a license to produce the MAG and FN manufactured the first batch of guns while the Royal Small Arms Factory at Enfield established a production line. Enfield made some small improvements to the L7A1 in the late 1960s to create the L7A2. Improvements included: a new 10-position gas regulator, a plastic buttstock, improved feed pawls, a refined bipod, provision for a feed box and a new optic mounting bracket.

In the late 1980s the British Army adopted the L86A1 LSW (Light Support Weapon), chambered in 5.56x45mm, to replace the L7A2 in the assault role. FN’s Minimi light machine gun, designated the L108A1 (standard) and L110A2 (para), in turn replaced the the L86A1′s when the LSW’s sustained fire capability proved to be unsatisfactory. Despite attempts to replace it with lighter weapons the L7A2, along with the L8 vehicle mounted and L20 aircraft mounted MAGs, continue to be extensively used by the British military. 

image

L86A1 Light Support Weapon (source)

FN offer the MAG in three main variations: the Model 60-20 for infantry roles, the Model 60-40 which can be mounted on armoured fighting vehicles and the Model 60-30 suitable for mounting on aircraft. All three variants are gas-operated, locked breech machine guns which fire from an open bolt.  

Firing from an open bolt the MAG uses a long stroke gas piston positioned beneath the barrel. It has a cross-bolt safety which disables the sear. Vervier borrowed heavily from other weapons with the MG42 influencing the MAG’s trigger mechanism, feed system and quick change barrel system. The MAG derived it’s locking mechanism from the M1918 Browning Automatic Rifle.

The weapon weighs ~11kg when fitted with its butt and bipod and is 126cm (or 50 inches) long. It has a selector switch which allows the operator to chose between a lower rate of fire (~600 rounds per minute) and a higher rate of approximately 1,000 rounds per minute. The MAG can be used in both offensive and static defensive sustained fire roles (see image #4, #6, #7 & #9). In the sustained fire role the British L7 can be set up in a tripod and with a two-man crew can lay down fire out to ranges of up to 1,800 metres. The MAG feeds from the left using 50-round M13 disintegrating link belts, which can be linked end to end. Spent cases eject downward and links exit the receiver to the right.

Despite competition from contemporaries such as the American M60, French AA-52, and German MG-3 the MAG came to dominate the market and over 80 countries have purchased weapons from FN. FN also sold production licenses to countries including the UK, India, Argentina, Sweden, Singapore, Indonesia, Egypt and the United States. Over 200,000 MAGs have been produced during its sixty year service life with dozens of countries continuing to use them in a variety of roles. 

Sources:

Image Sources 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Provisional British Manual for X15E1 (1958) [source]

British Manual for L7A1 & L7A2 GPMG (1970) [source]

Jane’s Infantry Weapons 1983-84, I.V. Hogg


If you enjoy the content please consider supporting Historical Firearms through Patreon!

image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image

Anti-Aircraft Machine Guns of the Great War

World War One saw the first widespread use of aeroplanes, first as observation platforms and later in both air and ground attack roles. The strategic threat that observation planes posed meant that even in the early weeks of the war on the Western Front troops began opening fire on reconnaissance planes.  

On the 22nd August Lt. W. R. Read, a pilot with the British Royal Flying Corps noted that: “Two machines that went out this morning on reconnaissance came back with several bullet holes in them. In one the observer was shot in the stomach.” On that same day the Royal Flying Corps lost its first aircraft to enemy infantry fire when German infantry shot down an Avro 504. The role of observation planes soon proved pivotal as it was intelligence on German movements from the Royal Flying Corps that prevented the British Expeditionary Force from being surrounded before they retreated to Mons.

While ground fire initially came from enemy rifles, field artillery was also pressed into service. Lt. Read recalled taking fire from German artillery batteries in his diary in late August 1914, “Le Cateau was in flames. We were shelled by anti-aircraft guns so I kept at 4,500 feet.” While artillery and massed rifle fire continued to pose a threat to aircraft the use of machine guns in an anti-aircraft role quickly became the norm. In the photographs above we see examples of both light and heavy machine guns pressed into the anti-aircraft role by both sides. The British and Commonwealth forces deployed both the Lewis Light Machine Gun (which can be seen in images 1, 2 & 16) and the Vickers Machine gun (seen in image 10). Of these the Lewis Gun was lighter and much easier to aim and fire. The British also deployed a number of Vickers QF 1-pounder ‘Pom-Pom’ guns in London as a defence against German Zeppelins in 1914-1915, however, they proved to be largely ineffective and were replaced. The French deployed both the Hotchkiss Mle 1914 (seen in images 13 & 19) and the St Etienne Mle 1907 (seen in images 8, 11, 15 & 17) in the anti-aircraft role - even deployed some on the observation deck of the Eiffel Tower when Paris was threatened by German aircraft (see image 15). 

The Central Powers also deployed their two primary machine guns; the Germans used the Maxim MG08 (see images 3, 4, 6, 12 & 20) while the Austrians deployed their Schwarzlose M.7 (as seen in images 14, 18 & 21). The M.7′s folding grips were especially useful in the anti-aircraft role. Germany also deployed a number of 37mm Maxim ‘pom pom’ guns which had been adopted by the navy before the turn of the century. Originally intended as a deck gun for defence against fast torpedo boats they were heavy and unwieldy. Similarly there are photographs of 37mm Hotchkiss Revolving Canons being used as anti-aircraft guns (see image 9). These were manually operated guns with five barrels designed by Benjamin Hotchkiss

Towards the end of the war Germany had begun developing a larger calibre machine gun capable of firing the 13.2mm TuF cartridge designed as an anti-tank and anti-aircraft round. The MG08 was scaled up to chamber the new Tank und Flieger (Tank and Aircraft) ammunition, however, production began too late in the war for these guns to see service. 

image

The German MG18 TuF heavy machine gun (source)

When the American Expeditionary Force arrived in France they were given French equipment including the Hotchkiss Mle 1914, they deployed this in both the infantry and anti-aircraft roles (see images 5 & 7). 

The deployment of machine guns in the new anti-aircraft role meant that their crews often had to improvise ways of elevating the guns as the standard tripods were not designed for the new role. As so often in war necessity was the mother of invention and both sides found similar solutions to the problem these ranged from being as simple as digging a pit to mount the gun on a central mound (see images 2, 10 & 19) to as complex as attaching a cart wheel to a post to allow free movement (see images 1 & 6). French tripods for the Mle 1907 could be elevated to steeper angles than their British and German counterparts and photographs often show gunners laying between the tripods fully extended legs (see images 11, 15 & 17). Although useful it was extremely difficult to effectively traverse the gun from this position. Other improvised solutions included placing a standard tripod on a tree stump (as in images 2, 12, 14, 18 & 21) or raising it with ammunition boxes (see image 8). While specialised mounts were quickly developed (see images 4, 5, 13 & 16) these were not always available and improvised positions continued to be used throughout the war.

Specialised training, anti-aircraft sights and mounts were developed as the war progressed and the efficiency of machine gun anti-aircraft batteries increased. Perhaps the most famous victim of anti-aircraft machine gun fire is Manfred von Richthofen, the Red Baron. The fighter ace was killed by a single .303 round that caused a fatal chest wound, however, it is unknown who fired the fatal shot. Evidence suggests it may have been fired by either Sergeant Cedric Popkin, an anti-aircraft gunner with the 24th Australian Machine Gun Company who was manning a Vickers gun or Gunner W.J. Evans of the 53rd Battery, 14th Field Artillery Battery of the Royal Australian Artillery who was manning a Lewis Gun. While it remains unclear who actually fired the fatal shot, it almost certainly came from an anti-aircraft machine gun position.

Image Sources:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22

The Beginning of Air Warfare, 1914, eyewitnesstohistory.com, (source)


If you enjoy the content please consider supporting Historical Firearms through Patreon!

British Expeditionary Forces, 25 Years Apart

In the two photographs above we see two groups of British infantrymen 25 years apart defending positions in Northern France and Belgium during the two World Wars. The men belong to the British Expeditionary Forces of 1914 and 1940.

In the first photograph we see a company of British infantry deployed on the bank of a road in southern Belgium in August 1914 while in the second photograph a platoon of the 4th Battalion, the Border Regiment line the edge of a road on the Somme front in May 1940. 
While these soldiers are separated by decades there are some similarities between their equipment and some more obvious differences.  Firstly, both use the Short Magazine Lee Enfield rifle, the SMLE had been the British Army’s standard issue rifle for seven years by 1914 and proved to be one of the best rifles of World War One.  It had remained in service and was once again carried into battle by the BEF.  With its smooth, cock-on-closing bolt and 10-round magazine it could still be fired faster by a trained infantryman than the German Mauser 98k carried by the Wehrmacht.  By 1940 an improved pattern was superseding the earlier MkIII SMLEs, the Rifle, No. 4 Mk I was a stronger and easier to manufacture development of the Lee-Enfield design.

In the foreground of the first photograph we can see one of the battalions two .303 Vickers-Maxim machine guns. In 1914 each British infantry battalion was equipped with just two machine guns, this would rapidly increase during the course of the war.  It would not be until early 1916, that Britain introduced its first light machine gun, the Lewis Gun. In the second photograph we can see the troops have set up three Bren light machine guns, the Bren Gun was based on a Czech design the ZB vz. 26 and was introduced in 1937.  By 1940 each infantry regiment was issued with fifty Bren guns.   The heavier Vickers guns had been withdrawn from infantry battalions during the First World War and grouped together into Machine Gun Battalions with forty-eight Vickers medium machine guns massed in each.  

The main obvious difference between the men of 1914 and 1940 is their kit.  The men of 1914 wear cloth slouch caps while the men of 1940 wear the steel Brodie Helmet which was first introduced in 1916.  Gone too are the ‘puttees’ which bound the soldiers lower legs replaced by webbing leggings.  The men’s equipment belts share some similarities with the men of 1940 using the 1937 Pattern Web Equipment, an evolved version of the ‘webbing’ adopted in 1908.   The major change is the introduction of the ‘battledress’ made up of trousers and a blouse tunic, adopted by the British Army in 1938 and much copied throughout Europe.

Both the BEF of 1914 and 1940 failed in their objectives of halting the German advance through Belgium, Holland and Northern France.  In 1914 the German advance was only partially halted in Northern France before the opposing armies leap-frogged south-east in an attempt to outflank one another until stalemate eventually set in.  In 1940 however, the Wehrmacht proved far more successful managing to outmaneuver the allied forces and pushing the BEF back to the channel coast and eventually forcing them to evacuate from Dunkirk.

Image One Source

Image Two Source

Battalion Organisation during the Second World War (source)

Military Uniforms in Colour, P. Kannik, (1968)

Anonymous asked:
Would it be possible to do a comparison of weapons used by the Royal Marine Corps vs. The United States Marine Corps during The early 1900's (1900-1919)?

That’s an interesting period to compare, ostensibly the two corps were very alike, both were the elite landing forces of their respective countries and fulfilled similar roles.  During the Boxer Rebellion in 1900 and the subsequent international relief campaign the two corps fought side by side.  

Royal Marines

In 1900, the British Royal Marines were named the Royal Marines Light Infantry and as such were trained to act as a light infantry force which would be landed ahead of a main force to secure the immediate landing area. During the Boxer Rebellion the RMLI wore a dark navy blue jacket and trousers with either a field service cap or Wolseley helmet, by the time the First World War began the uniform had not much changed and the Royal Marines which fought at Antwerp in 1914 wore much the same uniform but wore the distinctive service Broderick cap.

image

RMLI c.1914 (source)

Until 1890, the Royal Marines were armed with the .577/450 Martini-Henry single shot breech loader.  This had been in service since 1871 and had been used in dozens of colonial campaigns.  The Martini-Henry was replaced by the Lee-Metford bolt action magazine rifle.  The Lee-Metford was the precursor to the famous Lee-Enfield Rifle.  The Lee-Metford itself was replaced in 1895 by the Magazine Lee-Enfield - much the same rifle except the rifling had been improved to handle smokeless powder.

image

Charger Loading Lee-Enfield (source)

By 1905, these MLEs had been converted to load from charger clips and redesignated Charger Loading Lee-Enfields (CLLEs).  In 1907, the earlier Lee-Enfield rifle patterns were replaced with the SMLE which was significantly shorter and handier than the earlier rifles. You can read more about the evolution of the Lee-Enfield here.  In 1914 there was a significant shortage of rifles as the British Army expanded rapidly and dried up all existing stocks of rifles.  As such the marines and the Royal Naval Division which they formed with volunteers from the Royal Navy in 1914 were often armed with the older Charger Loading Lee-Enfields until production of SMLEs caught up.  

As for side arms the British military of the period used a variety of Webley Revolvers.  These were mainly used by officers (who often bought them privately) and by designated marines such as buglers, signalers and some NCOs.

image

British Vickers Machine Gun MKI (source)

The RMLI was armed much as the regular British Army was in 1914, the machine gun they were issued with was the improved Vickers gun adopted in 1912. 

More on the history of the Royal Marines here

US Marine Corps

The US Marine Corps of the 19th century was very small in comparison with its current form, made up of a hand full of regiments.  However, it came into its own during the US’ Banana Wars which involved US military action across the Caribbean and Pacific.  The USMC was present during the Spanish-American War, the US’ interventions in Panama, Mexico, Nicaragua, the Philippine–American War and the Boxer Rebellion.

image

USMC c.1900 (source)

The USMC was uniformed much as the US Army was by 1900, with navy blue jacket and trousers and khaki campaign hat (see above).  By 1914, the blue had been replaced by a khaki/sand coloured service dress for use on campaign.  The marines who arrived in France in 1917 wore khaki tunics, trousers and M1912 Service hat (and Brodie helmet).

image

Illustration showing the evolution of the USMC’s uniform (source)

In 1900 the USMC was armed with the M1892-98 Krag rifle, a Norwegian design the US Krag was chambered in .30-40 Krag which had proved itself not fit for purpose during the Spanish-American War where it was outclassed by the Spanish Mausers it faced.  However the rifle wasn’t fully withdrawn from service until around 1910.

image

M1892-98 Krag (source)

The Krag was replaced by the Springfield M1903, a Mauser derivative, chambered in the new .30-06 spitzer round.  Despite a false start and some revisions the M1903 was widely issued by 1905 and many were carried during the Banana Wars and during World War One.   

The sidearms used by the USMC during the period were quite varied, ranging from the M1905 and M1909 Colt revolvers chambered in .38 and .45, there was also some use of the venerable Colt Single Action Army when it was found the .38 Revolvers lacked stopping power. However, by 1912 the USMC had followed the US Army’s lead and adopted Colt M1911 semi-automatic pistol in .45ACP - which would remain in service for over 70 years.

image

General Barnett testing a Colt-Browning M1895, with a Lewis Gun in the foreground and a Hotchkiss M1909 in the background (source)

As for machine guns the USMC used a number of different weapons, initially using the Colt-Browning M1895 ‘potato-digger’ machine guns (adopted by the US Navy but not the Army) as well as the M1909 Benet-Mercie light machine gun which saw extensive service.  These were replaced in time by the M1915 Vickers and later the M1917 Browning heavy machine guns, and the Lewis Light Machine Gun which was adopted by the USMC but not the US Army.  The M1918 Browning Automatic Rifle and the Winchester M1897 Trench gun were also adopted during World War One

More on the USMC here

I hope that adequately answers your question, thanks for the message

Colt-Vickers M1915: America’s 2nd Maxim Gun

While the heavy machine guns of John Browning have become synonymous with the US Army since the turn of the 20th century, it was actually the Maxim gun, which was the US Army’s most used machine gun of the First World War, with 13 US divisions equipped with the Colt-Vickers M1915.  

First introduced in 1887, the Maxim gun was revolutionary.  It instantly made all preceding hand operated machine guns like the Gatling Gun obsolete.  Over the next 15 years the Maxim was adopted by almost every major military power across the globe including Great Britain who adopted an improved model built by Vickers Ltd.  It was this Vickers-improved design which the US would adopt in 1914.  However, the Colt-Vickers Model of 1915 was not the first Maxim adopted by the US Army, in 1904, after several years of fitful testing an order was placed with Vickers, Sons & Maxim of England to manufacture a run of 90 machine guns while licensed manufacturing was prepared at Colt.  In the end only 287 Maxim Model 1904s were built before the US Army began to favour the Benét-Mercié, which was adopted in 1909. 

With the outbreak of World War One and the obvious dominance of the machine gun the US began to realise that in comparison for example to Germany who fielded approximately 12,000 machine guns at the onset of war their machine gun capability was woeful.  When the US entered the war in 1917 the US machine gun establishment was made up of a mishmash of guns dating from the turn of the century.  These included Colt-Browning M1895s, Maxim M1904sBenét-Mercié M1909s and Lewis light machine guns.

US troops training with the Benét-Mercié M1909 (source)

In 1913, US Ordnance had begun the search for a new machine gun to replace the mixture of designs then in service.  Seven competing designs were tested including a British Vickers MkI which jammed just 23 times during extensive testing with no parts broken.  This greatly impressed the selection board who unanimously deemed the Vickers as the best machine gun tested,  Captain John Butler of the Office of the Chief of Ordnance later described how the Vickers gun “…stood in a class by itself. Not a single part was broken nor replaced. Nor was there a jam worthy of the name during the entire series of tests.  A better performance could not be desired.”  

The Vickers-Maxim was adopted as the ‘Vickers Machine Gun Model of 1915, Caliber .30, Water-Cooled' with an initial order of over 4,000 guns.  However, as with the earlier Maxim M1904 production issues at Colt meant that by 1917, the US Army has not received any of the ordered guns, this put the Army at a grave tactical disadvantages as they had neither the machine guns to equip divisions shipping out to Europe nor had they had the chance to train and develop tactics for the use of machine guns in the field.   As a result when the lead divisions of the American Expeditionary Force reached France they were equipped with French and British machine guns.  The first US troops to be issued with the Vickers M1915 were the ten divisions that arrived in June 1918.   By the end of the First World War thirteen US combat divisions in Europe were armed with the Vickers M1915, with some 7,600 guns in the field this made it the most widely use American-made machine gun of the war.

British Vickers Machine Gun MKI (source)

Physically the US Vickers M1915 is almost identical to the British Vickers .303 MkI.  They share the instantly recognisable muzzle booster and indented barrel shroud.  Both cycled at around 450 to 500 rounds per minute and while the guns could be differentiated by their markings, grips and sights the main difference between to two weapons was their ammunition.  
The British Vickers fired the rimmed .303 round while the M1915 fired the rimless US .30-06, as such when the US shipped Vickers M1915s to British during World War Two as part of the Lend-Lease scheme the newly arrived American weapons were painted with a red stripe on the receiver to differentiate the very similar looking guns to prevent soldiers firing the wrong ammunition in the weapon.

By 1918, the US Army had adopted the American-designed Colt-Browning M1917 which was simpler to manufacture and began issuing this in the place of the Vickers M1915 in late 1918.  By the time Colt ended production some 12,125 guns had been produced, today due to loss in action, Lend-Lease shipments to Britain during World War Two and the loss of remaining stocks in the Philippines during the early Pacific campaign the Vickers M1915 is a rare weapon with its important role as the US Army’s main machine gun during World War One largely forgotten.

Sources:

Image One Source

Image Two Source

Image Three & Four Source

U.S. Colt Vickers Model of 1915 - Small Arms Defense Journal, January 2012, (Source)

Vickers American Roots & Ties (Source)

Military Small Arms, I. Hogg & J. Weeks, (1985)

Canadian ‘Autocar’ Machine Gun Carrier

In mid 1914 Britain began to mobilise its Imperial forces calling for assistance from its major colonies; India, Australia, South Africa and Canada.  The Canadian Expeditionary Forces arrived in Britain in October 1914, accompanying it was the world’s first mechanised armoured unit: The Canadian Automobile Machine Gun Brigade.

Formed in September 1914, the Automobile Machine Gun Brigade was the brainchild of Major (later Brigadier) Raymond Brutinel.  The brigade included mortar batteries, motorcyclists and bicycle mounted infantry but most impressively 20 armoured lorries/trucks - eight of which were mounted with a pair of machine guns.

Brutinel, who had served as Captain in the French Army before emigrating to Canada in 1904,  raised the corps using private funding donated by Canada’s wealthier citizens.  This private funding enabled him to quickly contract a number of American manufacturing companies to provide the components needed for his armoured vehicles.   Brutinel contracted the Autocar Company - a Pennsylvania manufacturer of cab over engine trucks, to build a run of small armoured trucks which would eventually number 20.  The armour plate was purchased from theBethlehem Steel Company, finally a contract for 20 M1895/14 Colt-Browning machine guns chambered in US .30 calibre was ordered.

Each of the machine gun-armed trucks initially mounted two M1895/14 Colt-Browning machine guns(see image #1 & #3), the Canadian Army’s standard machine gun at the beginning of the war.  However, with the Colt-Brownings being chambered in US .30 and not .303 as with all of the Canadian Army's M1895/14 the machine guns were found lacking and subsequently replaced with the British Army’s standard .303 Vickers Guns once these were available in 1916.  

The armoured lorries were built onto the chassis of two-ton Autocar trucks.  An armour plate skirt was fitted to the chassis with 5 mm thick steel plate at the front and sides and 3 mm at the rear of the vehicle. The protection did not enclose the gun crews and would only offer the minimum protection from long range small arms fire.  The armoured side skirts could be lowered if needed and in addition to the two swivel machine gun mounts there was also a position to mount a Lewis Gun.  

The Autocar truck itself was powered by a 22 horsepower engine which gave the 'Autocar’ Machine Gun Carrier a top speed of 25 miles per hour on decent roads. It’s off-road capability was lacking as it used solid rubber tires with rudimentary commercial suspension.   The truck was served by two three-man machine gun crews, a driver and an officers (who might also man a Lewis Gun).  The other armoured trucks were used as supply carriers and officers transports and one was outfitted as an ambulance.

The 'Autocar’ Machine Gun Carriers of the Automobile Machine Gun Brigade spent the first two years of the war in Britain until they deployed to France in 1916.  Primarily the Machine Gun Carriers were intended to provide indirect supporting machine gun fire to suppress enemy troops while Canadian infantry advanced and were not directly engage the enemy.  They frequently acted as a mobile flying-column which could move to give increased machine gun support to sectors that needed it.  They played a large role in stemming German advanced in 1918 and in the allied counter attack, alongside other allied armoured cars, which followed.

The last remaining example of a Autocar Machine Gun Carrier is part of the Canadian War Museum’s collection in Ottawa.  The armoured machine gun carriers predated the British Tanks developed in 1916 by two years and could easily be described as one of the first example of an armoured mechanised vehicle adopted by a major military power.

Sources:

Image One Source

Image Two Source

Image Three Source

Image Four Source

Image Five Source

Image Six Source

Image Seven Source

Ironsides: Canadian Armoured Fighting Vehicle Museums and Monuments, H.A. Skaarup, (2011) 

Colt-Vickers M1915: America’s 2nd Maxim Gun

While the heavy machine guns of John Browning have become synonymous with the US Army since the turn of the 20th century, it was actually the Maxim gun, which was the US Army’s most used machine gun of the First World War, with 13 US divisions equipped with the Colt-Vickers M1915.  

First introduced in 1887, the Maxim gun was revolutionary.  It instantly made all preceding hand operated machine guns like the Gatling Gun obsolete.  Over the next 15 years the Maxim was adopted by almost every major military power across the globe including Great Britain who adopted an improved model built by Vickers Ltd.  It was this Vickers-improved design which the US would adopt in 1914.  However, the Colt-Vickers Model of 1915 was not the first Maxim adopted by the US Army, in 1904, after several years of fitful testing an order was placed with Vickers, Sons & Maxim of England to manufacture a run of 90 machine guns while licensed manufacturing was prepared at Colt.  In the end only 287 Maxim Model 1904s were built before the US Army began to favour the Benét-Mercié, which was adopted in 1909. 

With the outbreak of World War One and the obvious dominance of the machine gun the US began to realise that in comparison for example to Germany who fielded approximately 12,000 machine guns at the onset of war their machine gun capability was woeful.  When the US entered the war in 1917 the US machine gun establishment was made up of a mishmash of guns dating from the turn of the century.  These included Colt-Browning M1895s, Maxim M1904sBenét-Mercié M1909s and Lewis light machine guns.

US troops training with the Benét-Mercié M1909 (source)

In 1913, US Ordnance had begun the search for a new machine gun to replace the mixture of designs then in service.  Seven competing designs were tested including a British Vickers MkI which jammed just 23 times during extensive testing with no parts broken.  This greatly impressed the selection board who unanimously deemed the Vickers as the best machine gun tested,  Captain John Butler of the Office of the Chief of Ordnance later described how the Vickers gun “…stood in a class by itself. Not a single part was broken nor replaced. Nor was there a jam worthy of the name during the entire series of tests.  A better performance could not be desired.”  

The Vickers-Maxim was adopted as the ‘Vickers Machine Gun Model of 1915, Caliber .30, Water-Cooled' with an initial order of over 4,000 guns.  However, as with the earlier Maxim M1904 production issues at Colt meant that by 1917, the US Army has not received any of the ordered guns, this put the Army at a grave tactical disadvantages as they had neither the machine guns to equip divisions shipping out to Europe nor had they had the chance to train and develop tactics for the use of machine guns in the field.   As a result when the lead divisions of the American Expeditionary Force reached France they were equipped with French and British machine guns.  The first US troops to be issued with the Vickers M1915 were the ten divisions that arrived in June 1918.   By the end of the First World War thirteen US combat divisions in Europe were armed with the Vickers M1915, with some 7,600 guns in the field this made it the most widely use American-made machine gun of the war.

British Vickers Machine Gun MKI (source)

Physically the US Vickers M1915 is almost identical to the British Vickers .303 MkI.  They share the instantly recognisable muzzle booster and indented barrel shroud.  Both cycled at around 450 to 500 rounds per minute and while the guns could be differentiated by their markings, grips and sights the main difference between to two weapons was their ammunition.  
The British Vickers fired the rimmed .303 round while the M1915 fired the rimless US .30-06, as such when the US shipped Vickers M1915s to British during World War Two as part of the Lend-Lease scheme the newly arrived American weapons were painted with a red stripe on the receiver to differentiate the very similar looking guns to prevent soldiers firing the wrong ammunition in the weapon.

By 1918, the US Army had adopted the American-designed Colt-Browning M1917 which was simpler to manufacture and began issuing this in the place of the Vickers M1915 in late 1918.  By the time Colt ended production some 12,125 guns had been produced, today due to loss in action, Lend-Lease shipments to Britain during World War Two and the loss of remaining stocks in the Philippines during the early Pacific campaign the Vickers M1915 is a rare weapon with its important role as the US Army’s main machine gun during World War One largely forgotten.

Sources:

Image One Source

Image Two Source

Image Three & Four Source

U.S. Colt Vickers Model of 1915 - Small Arms Defense Journal, January 2012, (Source)

Vickers American Roots & Ties (Source)

Military Small Arms, I. Hogg & J. Weeks, (1985)